Global Bass Guitar market was million US$ in 2017 and is expected to million US$ by the end of 2025

Get a full report sample:

https://www.qyresearch.com/index/detail/497778/global-bass-guitar-market

Summary

The 2018-2025 Global Bass Guitar Industry Market Research Report is a professional and in-depth study on the current state of the Bass Guitar industry.

In a word, the report provides major statistics on the state of the industry and is a valuable source of guidance and direction for companies and individuals interested in the market.

Click to request a sample:

https://www.qyresearch.com/sample-form/form/497235/global-Bass Guitar-market

This report studies the Bass Guitar market size (value and volume) by players, regions, product types and end industries, history data 2013-2017 and forecast data 2018-2025; This report also studies the global market competition landscape, market drivers and trends, opportunities and challenges, risks and entry barriers, sales channels, distributors and Porter’s Five Forces Analysis.

The global Bass Guitar market was  million US$ in 2017 and is expected to  million US$ by the end of 2025, growing at a CAGR of  between 2018 and 2025.

Geographically, this report is segmented into several key regions, with sales, revenue, market share and growth Rate of Bass Guitar in these regions, from 2013 to 2025, covering

North America (United States, Canada and Mexico)

Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Russia and Turkey etc.)

Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia and Vietnam)

South America (Brazil etc.)

Middle East and Africa (Egypt and GCC Countries)

 

The various contributors involved in the value chain of the product include manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, intermediaries, and customers. The key manufacturers in this market include

Fender

B.C. Rich

Bridge

BSX Bass

Conklin Guitars

Cort

G&L

Gold Tone

Hofner

Italia Guitars USA

Kay Vintage Reissue Guitars

Ken Smith Design

Kydd Basses

Lakland

Michael Kelly

Alvarez

Rickenbacker

Ibanez

Washburn

Schecter

Gibson

Warwick

Yamaha

Lakland

Peavey

By the product type, the market is primarily split into

Four-string Bass Guitar

Five-string Bass Guitar

Six-string Bass Guitar

By the end users/application, this report covers the following segments

Music Teaching

Performance

Other

 

We can also provide the customized separate regional or country-level reports, for the following regions:

North America

United States

Canada

Mexico

Asia-Pacific

China

India

Japan

South Korea

Australia

Indonesia

Singapore

Malaysia

Philippines

Thailand

Vietnam

Rest of Asia-Pacific

Europe

Germany

France

UK

Italy

Spain

Russia

Rest of Europe

Central & South America

Brazil

Rest of Central & South America

Middle East & Africa

GCC Countries

Turkey

Egypt

South Africa

Rest of Middle East & Africa

 

The study objectives of this report are:

To study and analyze the global Bass Guitar market size (value & volume) by company, key regions/countries, products and application, history data from 2013 to 2017, and forecast to 2025.

To understand the structure of Bass Guitar market by identifying its various subsegments.

To share detailed information about the key factors influencing the growth of the market (growth potential, opportunities, drivers, industry-specific challenges and risks).

Focuses on the key global Bass Guitar manufacturers, to define, describe and analyze the sales volume, value, market share, market competition landscape, SWOT analysis and development plans in next few years.

To analyze the Bass Guitar with respect to individual growth trends, future prospects, and their contribution to the total market.

To project the value and volume of Bass Guitar submarkets, with respect to key regions (along with their respective key countries).

To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.

To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their growth strategies.

 

In this study, the years considered to estimate the market size of Bass Guitar are as follows:

History Year: 2013-2017

Base Year: 2017

Estimated Year: 2018

Forecast Year 2018 to 2025

 

This report includes the estimation of market size for value (million USD) and volume (K Units). Both top-down and bottom-up approaches have been used to estimate and validate the market size of Bass Guitar market, to estimate the size of various other dependent submarkets in the overall market. Key players in the market have been identified through secondary research, and their market shares have been determined through primary and secondary research. All percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns have been determined using secondary sources and verified primary sources.

 

For the data information by region, company, type and application, 2017 is considered as the base year. Whenever data information was unavailable for the base year, the prior year has been considered.

 

Key Stakeholders

Raw material suppliers

Distributors/traders/wholesalers/suppliers

Regulatory bodies, including government agencies and NGO

Commercial research & development (R&D) institutions

Importers and exporters

Government organizations, research organizations, and consulting firms

Trade associations and industry bodies

End-use industries

 

Available Customizations

With the given market data, QYResearch offers customizations according to the company’s specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Further breakdown of Bass Guitar market on basis of the key contributing countries.

Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players.

 

Table of contents:

Charpter 1 -Bass Guitar Market Overview

Charpter 2 – Global Bass Guitar Competition by Players/Suppliers, Type and Application

Charpter 3 – United States Bass Guitar (Volume, Value and Sales Price)

Charpter 4 – China Bass Guitar (Volume, Value and Sales Price)

Charpter 5- Europe Bass Guitar (Volume, Value and Sales Price)

Charpter 6 – Japan Bass Guitar (Volume, Value and Sales Price)

Charpter 7 – Southeast Asia Bass Guitar (Volume, Value and Sales Price)

Charpter 8 – India Bass Guitar (Volume, Value and Sales Price)

Charpter 9 – Global Bass Guitar Players/Suppliers Profiles and Sales Data

Charpter 10 – Bass Guitar Maufacturing Cost Analysis

Charpter 11 – Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers

Charpter 12 – Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders

Charpter 13 – Market Effect Factors Analysis

Charpter 14 – Global Bass Guitar Market Forecast (2018-2022)

Charpter 15 – Research Findings and Conclusion

Charpter 16 – Appendix

 

Request for more information: sales@qyresearchglobal.com

About Us: QY Research established in 2007, focus on custom research, management consulting, IPO consulting, industry chain research, data base and seminar services. The company owned a large basic data base (such as National Bureau of statistics database, Customs import and export database, Industry Association Database etc), expert’s resources (included energy automotive chemical medical ICT consumer goods etc.

Contact US

QY Research, INC.   

17890 Castleton, Suite 218,

City of industry, CA – 91748    

USA: +1 626 295 2442

Email – sales@qyresearchglobal.com

Web – www.qyresearch.com

 

Market Analysis – Global Enhanced Vision System (EVS) Market Research Report 2018

QYRlogo

The Global Enhanced Vision System (EVS) Market Research Report 2018 is in-depth study of overall Enhanced Vision System (EVS) market including introduction of product, definition, scope, Enhanced Vision System (EVS) global sale, and forecast up to 2025.

The Enhanced Vision System (EVS) industry report clarifies the past experience and trends, on the basis of these past experiences, it offers the future prediction considering other factors influencing the growth rate. This worldwide report offers the detailed analysis of the important factors such as market dynamics (DROT), PEST, and PORTER which assists the growth of the Enhanced Vision System (EVS) Industry. These past experience and factors assist to build the strategy and future planning of Enhanced Vision System (EVS) Market and hold a place in the competitive world.

This report is the extensive analysis of the Enhanced Vision System (EVS) industry based on the primary and secondary in-depth research. The scope of the report includes the ‘global’ and ‘regional’ sale, product consumption in terms of ‘volume’ and ‘value’. The Enhanced Vision System (EVS) market report offers a forecast of revenue, CAGR, and cumulative revenue. The gathered information about Enhanced Vision System (EVS) global business is represented in the figures, tables, pie chart, and graphs.

The Enhanced Vision System (EVS) industry Market report offers the competitive scenario in the Enhanced Vision System (EVS) industry based on the type of product, applications, and the companies that are present in the Enhanced Vision System (EVS) market, and covers the company profiles, their development policies, lined up products and recent launched along with the SWOT analysis of companies.

To get a complete report sample from this link: https://www.qyresearch.com/index/detail/64091/global-enhanced-vision-system-evs-market            
This report studies the global Enhanced Vision System (EVS) market status and forecast, categorizes the global Enhanced Vision System (EVS) market size (value & volume) by manufacturers, type, application, and region. This report focuses on the top manufacturers in North America, Europe, Japan, China, and other regions (India, Southeast Asia, Central & South America, and Middle East & Africa).

Enhanced vision system, a stand-alone thermal imaging camera that sees infrared energy emitting, or radiating, from objects and forms a real-time video image that is displayed on an MFD or dedicated video display screen. The system’s primary benefit is improving situational awareness. At night, an EVS eliminates the visual effects of darkness, turning it into day on the display, and enabling the pilot to see and avoid clouds at night. During the day, the system enables the pilot to see through smoke, haze and smog.

At present, in developed countries, the Enhanced Vision System (EVS) industry is generally at a more advanced level. The world’s large enterprises are mainly concentrated in USA, Europe and Israel. Meanwhile, foreign companies have more advanced equipment, strong R & D capability, and leading technical level.

By application, the global Enhanced Vision System (EVS) market is segmented into Military Aircraft, Business Jet and Other Civil Aircraft, The application market is saturated and the Business Jet have a quick development in recent years. According to the International Air Transport Association, China will surpass the United States to become the world’s largest commercial air passenger market in the next two decades.

Aircraft safety, situational awareness, and reliable operations at low visibility are factors driving the enhanced vision systems market. Whereas, high amount of investment and lengthy clearance process for upgradation of components act as some of the major restraints for the enhanced vision systems market.

The global Enhanced Vision System (EVS) market is valued at 210 million US$ in 2017 and will reach 300 million US$ by the end of 2025, growing at a CAGR of 5.3% during 2018-2025.

The major manufacturers covered in this report

Elbit Systems (Opgal)

Rockwell Collins

Honeywell

Esterline Technologies

Astronics MAX-VIZ

BAE Systems

Thales Group

Geographically, this report studies the top producers and consumers, focuses on product capacity, production, value, consumption, market share and growth opportunity in these key regions, covering

North America

Europe

China

Japan

Southeast Asia

India

We can also provide the customized separate regional or country-level reports, for the following regions:

North America

United States

Canada

Mexico

Asia-Pacific

China

India

Japan

South Korea

Australia

Indonesia

Singapore

Rest of Asia-Pacific

Europe

Germany

France

UK

Italy

Spain

Russia

Rest of Europe

Central & South America

Brazil

Argentina

Rest of South America

Middle East & Africa

Saudi Arabia

Turkey

Rest of Middle East & Africa

On the basis of product, this report displays the production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into

Stand-alone EVS

Combined Vision Systems (EVS+SVS)

On the basis of the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share and growth rate for each application, including

Military Aircraft

Business Jet Aircraft

Other Civil Aircraft

The study objectives of this report are:

To study and analyze the global Enhanced Vision System (EVS) market size (value & volume) by company, key regions/countries, products and application, history data from 2013 to 2017, and forecast to 2025.

To understand the structure of Enhanced Vision System (EVS) market by identifying its various subsegments.

To share detailed information about the key factors influencing the growth of the market (growth potential, opportunities, drivers, industry-specific challenges and risks).

Focuses on the key global Enhanced Vision System (EVS) manufacturers, to define, describe and analyze the sales volume, value, market share, market competition landscape, SWOT analysis and development plans in next few years.

To analyze the Enhanced Vision System (EVS) with respect to individual growth trends, future prospects, and their contribution to the total market.

To project the value and volume of Enhanced Vision System (EVS) submarkets, with respect to key regions (along with their respective key countries).

To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.

To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their growth strategies.

This research study focuses to product specifications, Enhanced Vision System (EVS) cost specifications, production capacity, distributors list, Enhanced Vision System (EVS) marketing channel, and detail analysis of the export/import of the product. The Enhanced Vision System (EVS) research document also offers raw material suppliers, cost, and downstream consumer list.

All features mentioned above is included in the Enhanced Vision System (EVS) Market Report 2018 which can offer solution to the difficulties to the prominent members of the Enhanced Vision System (EVS) market.

Additionally, the important terminologies, government policies, and regulations related to Enhanced Vision System (EVS) market product are added.

Benefits of Purchasing QYResearch Research Report

Analyst Support Get you queries resolved from our expert analysts before and after purchasing the report

Customer’s Satisfaction Our expert team will assist with all your research needs and customize the report

Inimitable Expertise Analysts will provide deep insights about the reports

Assured Quality We focus on the quality and accuracy of the report

Contact Details:

Company Name: QYResearch CO.,LIMITED | focus on Market Survey and Research

Tina| Sales Managers

Tel: 0086-20-22093278(CN)

Email: sales@qyresearchglobal.com or tinaning@qyresearch.com

Web: http://www.qyresearch.com/

 

Avoiding EU Privacy Law FaceBook 15 Billion User Data Escape (Figure)

Facebook plans to move 1.5 billion user data next month to circumvent the upcoming EU privacy laws and will affect more than 70% of users.

Facebook has previously revealed a scandal to protect user privacy. It is now planned to move 1.5 billion user data next month to circumvent the upcoming EU privacy laws. It is expected to affect more than 70% of users.

Currently, except for the United States and Canada, Facebook users are subject to the terms of service of their Irish international headquarters.

Facebook plans to change this situation next month, moving 1.5 billion user profiles in Africa, Asia, Australia and Latin America out of the jurisdiction of the “General Data Protection Regulation” (GDPR) that the European Union will enter into force on May 25. Retaining only European user data is governed by GDPR.

Facebook confirmed this plan to Reuters on the 17th, showing that they are eager to reduce the scope of GDPR jurisdiction. The new “Data Protection Regulations” allow European regulatory authorities to impose penalties on companies that have collected and used funds without their consent.

The removal of 1.5 billion users’ data as Facebook eliminates a huge potential liability because penalties for violations can be as high as 4% of the company’s annual global income, and in the case of Facebook, it can amount to billions of dollars.

Over 70% of Facebook’s more than 2 billion users will be affected.

Facebook executive chief Mark Zuckerberg told Reuters through interviews earlier this month that his company “spiritually” will make global businesses compliant with EU regulations, but is reluctant to commit this set of regulations as global Facebook. Business standards.

In fact, this change means that 1.5 billion affected users will not be able to file complaints against the Data Protection Commissioner of Ireland or sue Irish courts.

Michael Veale, a University of London College (UCL) science and technology policy researcher, said that these users will be protected by the more lenient US privacy regulations.

 

Contact Details:

Company Name: QYResearch Inc.  |  More Than 120,000 Market Research Reports

Global Market Research Report Leading Publisher

QYResearch Los Angeles Research Center

Email:  sales@qyresearchus.com

Web: http://www.qyresearch.com/

Address: 17890 Castleton Street Suite 218 City of Industry CA 91748 United  States

ZTE Chairman’s Internal Letter Exposure: What Has Been Experienced in the Past Two Years (Figure)

On April 20, the Xinhua news reporter confirmed from insiders of ZTE that this afternoon, ZTE will hold a press conference at the headquarters of Shenzhen, and the company’s top executives will attend.

On the morning of the same day, ZTE issued a statement on the US’s refusal to activate, saying that the company had voluntarily notified itself of the problem and that the US was very unfair in blocking ZTE. The company could not accept it.

At the same time, Yin Yimin, Chairman of ZTE Corporation, issued an internal letter to employees, and detailed explanations were made before and after the United States to activate the refusal order. They called on employees to work together and move forward.

Yin Yimin mentioned in his internal letter that ZTE complied with U.S. export control laws and earnestly fulfilled the relevant agreement obligations signed in March 2017 with various U.S. government agencies and paid over US$800 million in fines on schedule. The company supports the independent ombudsman appointed by the United States to carry out various supervision tasks including interviews, document submission, and system testing, and has accumulated a total output of over 132,000 pages. In the course of advancing the compliance construction, we learn lessons from the past and correct them in a timely manner. We will no longer make mistakes that have been made by some administrative cadres in the past.

Yin Yimin’s internal letter also reviewed the entire process of the incident: From November 30, 2016, the company submitted a letter to the relevant US government agencies on: (1) For some executives involved in the transactions of the sanctioned country and Employees take disciplinary measures (disciplinary actions include job adjustments, bonus deductions, sending disciplinary letters, etc.). Some of these measures have been implemented and the other part has been implemented as planned. (2) Report on the progress of ZTE’s construction of an export control compliance system and plans for the future. By March 2017, the company reached agreements with the US Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (hereinafter referred to as “BIS”), the US Department of Justice (DOJ), and the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Overseas Assets Management Office (hereinafter referred to as “relevant protocol”). From the end of February to the end of March 2018, the company’s chief export control compliance officer and a second law firm outside the company have collected information one after another, showing that the company’s bonus deduction plan for certain employees has not been implemented in a timely manner. And the company has adopted a series of response measures since then.

Yin Yimin stated in his internal letter that prior to the completion of the independent investigation, the US Department of Commerce alleged that the company had false statements in the letter dated November 30, 2016 and the letter dated July 20, 2017, and then made a penalty for activating the refusal order. BIS disregarded the company’s arduous efforts, huge investment, and long-term progress in compliance with export control compliance in the past two years. The issue of disregarding the above two letters was found by the company’s self-examination and timely notification; ignored the company’s first-time negligence. Responsible person, quickly correct the problem, and hire an authoritative US law firm to investigate. Before the relevant investigation has been concluded, BIS insists on the most stringent sanctions imposed on the company. It is extremely unfair to the company and we cannot accept it!

The following internal letter content:

(Yin Yimin, Chairman of ZTE Corporation.)

Yin Yimin, Chairman of ZTE Corporation.

Yin Yimin, chairman of the board:

All colleagues of the company:

From April 16, 2018, it was learned that the United States Department of Commerce’s refusal to activate the company has passed four days and nights. The incident has attracted the attention of all employees, families, and the community.

The company set up a crisis response working group the first time to fully assess the impact of the incident on the company and its employees, maintain active communication with all parties, and use the greatest efforts to promote the resolution of the incident. During this period, all employees of the company are united, stick to their jobs, do their jobs, and use the actual actions to tide over difficulties with the company. Thank you!

We are in a complex international situation with opportunities and challenges. In the past year or so, we have adopted compliance as one of the cornerstones of our company’s strategy and adhered to the principle of “export control compliance is the top priority”. The company complies with U.S. export control laws and earnestly fulfills its obligations under the relevant agreements signed in March 2017 with multiple U.S. government agencies and pays over US$800 million in fines on schedule. In 2017 alone, the company invested more than 50 million U.S. dollars for export control compliance and plans to invest more resources in 2018. The company supports the independent supervisor appointed by the United States (hereinafter referred to as the “ombudsman”) to carry out various supervision tasks including interviews, document submission, and system testing, and has accumulated more than 132,000 pages of output documents. From the management level to the employees, the company is fully involved and is committed to building a first-class, standardized and sustainable compliance management system in the industry. After continuous efforts and promotion, we have established a professional compliance team to build and optimize the company’s import and export control compliance management framework, systems, and processes. We have introduced and implemented SAP’s Trade Compliance Management Tools (GTS) to promote IT automation and control. Global compliance training for over 65,000 employees and compliance training for more than 45,000 employees through specific key positions have made tremendous progress in compliance culture and institutional development.

In the course of advancing the compliance construction, we learn lessons from the past and correct them in a timely manner. We will no longer make mistakes that have been made by some administrative cadres in the past.

The entire incident process is as follows:

On November 30, 2016, the company submitted a letter to the relevant U.S. government authorities on the following:

(1) Take disciplinary measures against some executives and employees involved in the transactions of the sanctioned country (disciplinary actions including job adjustment, bonus deductions, sending disciplinary letters, etc.). Some of these measures have been implemented and the other part has been implemented as planned.

(2) Report on the progress of ZTE’s construction of an export control compliance system and plans for the future.

In March 2017, the company and the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (hereinafter referred to as “BIS”), the U.S. Department of Justice (hereinafter referred to as “DOJ”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Overseas Assets Management Office respectively reached an agreement (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the relevant agreements”. “). The company and the DOJ agreement require four senior executives/employees to be dismissed from the company. Except for these four individuals, no other employee’s disciplinary requirements are involved in the relevant agreements. On May 9, 2017, the company notified the U.S. government of the fact that four senior executives/employees had left the company and their supporting documents.

On July 20, 2017, the first law firm hired by the company sent a letter to the U.S. government to describe the completion of disciplinary measures by some employees.

In late February and early March of 2018, the company’s chief export control compliance officer and a second law firm outside the company collected information one after another, indicating that the company’s bonus deduction plan for certain employees was not implemented in a timely manner.

On the morning of March 5, 2018, the company’s chief export control compliance officer and a second law firm outside the company reported this matter to me and proposed a series of actions. I agree and arrange for prompt action. On the afternoon of the same day, President Zhao Xianming confirmed his support for these actions and emphasized that these actions must be transparent and realistic. The company quickly arranged for a second law firm to conduct a survey of the relevant circumstances (hereinafter referred to as the “Survey”), and the company conducted an internal verification of the employees’ disciplinary performance.

On the morning of March 7, 2018 (March 6, U.S. time), the company took the initiative to report the situation to the relevant US government agencies and ombudsmen.

On March 8th, 2018, the company issued a punishment letter to relevant employees, and made arrangements for deducting the 2016 bonus, which will be deducted from the 2017 bonus. On March 14, 2018, a letter of punishment was issued to the resigned employees, and the recourse for deductible bonuses will be conducted in accordance with Chinese laws.

On March 8, 2018, the company took the initiative to report the situation to the United States District Court in the North District of Texas. Afterwards, on the advice of the chief export control compliance officer and the second law firm, on March 12, 2018, the company hired another law firm to conduct parallel investigations.

On March 16th, 2018, the company made a detailed statement to BIS on the relevant circumstances and attached the supporting documents that the company has taken measures. The company reported to BIS that it had arranged for an internal investigation procedure to be initiated. It requested that an external law firm be established for 45 days (before April 30th, 2018) to complete the relevant investigation.

The investigation was still in progress until the BIS activation refusal order on April 15, 2018 (US time). Prior to the completion of the independent investigation, the U.S. Department of Commerce alleged that the company had false statements in its letter dated November 30, 2016 and letter dated July 20, 2017, and then made a penalty for activating the refusal order. BIS disregarded the company’s arduous efforts, huge investment, and long-term progress in compliance with export control compliance in the past two years. The issue of disregarding the above two letters was found by the company’s self-examination and timely notification; ignored the company’s first-time negligence. Responsible person, quickly correct the problem, and hire an authoritative US law firm to investigate. Before the relevant investigation has been concluded, BIS insists on the most stringent sanctions imposed on the company. It is extremely unfair to the company and we cannot accept it! The company will not give up its efforts to solve problems through communication and dialogue, and it is determined to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests through all legal means.

The company’s board of directors, management, and all employees will unite, perform their duties, and never give up. Although the company is in a very difficult situation, but after completing the interpretation of the refusal order, the Compliance Team issued a code of conduct to be followed by all employees of the company in the event of an activation refusal order, reflecting the company’s firm adherence to the country in which it operates. The laws and regulations will not waver in their determination to comply with regulations as the cornerstone of the company’s strategy. The company’s board of directors and management will do their utmost to protect the rights of 80,000 employees to work legally, and the legal interests of 80,000 employees’ families. They will also make the utmost efforts to fulfill our commitment to thousands of operators worldwide. The responsibilities of partners and suppliers and hundreds of millions of corporate end-user consumers will also do their utmost to protect the interests of more than 300,000 shareholders worldwide.

At the same time, I appeal to all employees of the company to be sensible and to watch the incident and avoid over-emotionalization. The company promises to truthfully disclose the final findings to all employees with the consent of the lawyers. The company upholds an open, transparent, and honest attitude, continues to communicate, solves problems in a legal and compliant manner, and does its utmost to reduce the adverse impact of the matter.

Let us consolidate our beliefs, unite as one, join forces in the storm and move forward.

To prevent Chinese companies from investing in sensitive industries, the U.S. Department of the Treasury may initiate an economic emergency law!

The U.S. Department of the Treasury is considering the use of the “International Emergency Economic Power Bill” to curb Chinese companies’ investment in sensitive technology in the United States.

(Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)

The International Finance Institute of Washington International Finance Institute on the 19th in the Ministry of Finance, International Marketing and Investment Affairs Assistant Heather Tarbert said that the Ministry of Finance is considering the adoption of the “International Emergency Economic Power Act.” The International Emergency Economic Power Act (IEEPA) has hindered the feasibility of investing in Chinese companies.

IEEPA entered into force in 1977 and is usually used to sanction rogue regimes and terrorist organizations. According to its provisions, President Trump (Trump) has the right to declare a state of emergency in order to prevent transactions and confiscation of assets in response to “unconventional and extraordinary threats.”

The Financial Times reported that the Trump administration is concerned that the Communist Party of China is trying to invest in sensitive technologies such as semiconductors and robotics to obtain US technology and achieve its strategic plan.

After the United States Trade Representative (USTR) completed the 301 investigation and confirmed that the Chinese authorities had stolen intellectual property rights in the United States through mandatory technology transfer, President Trump signed an administrative memorandum on March 22, instructing USTR and Ministry to adopt countermeasures. Measures, including raising tariffs on Chinese goods by at least 25%, raising US$50 billion, lawsuit against the Chinese Communist Party, and restricting Chinese companies’ investment in the United States.

According to the memorandum, the Minister of Finance must submit an action plan and report progress to the President within 60 days (before May 21) in order to respond to the Chinese Communist Party’s guidance and assistance to Chinese companies investing in the United States, especially investment or technology in important American industries.

According to Bloomberg data, last year Chinese companies invested US$31.8 billion in the United States, compared with last year’s investment of US$53 billion. Tarbert said that the current investment restrictions only involve Chinese companies.

According to informed sources, officials of the Ministry of Finance are making plans to identify technology industries that prohibit Chinese companies from investing, such as semiconductors and 5G wireless communications.

Tarbert said at a meeting on Thursday that in addition to considering the use of IEEPA, the Ministry of Finance also supports the Congress to expand the “United States Foreign Investment Commission” (CFIUS) Act, but also consider Chinese companies. Impose stricter investment conditions, including national security issues considered by CFIUS when reviewing investment cases. He said that the Ministry of Finance has two units respectively responsible for IEEPA and CFIUS.

 

Contact Details:

Company Name: QYResearch Inc.  |  More Than 120,000 Market Research Reports

Global Market Research Report Leading Publisher

QYResearch Los Angeles Research Center

Email:  sales@qyresearchus.com

Web: http://www.qyresearch.com/

Address: 17890 Castleton Street Suite 218 City of Industry CA 91748 United  States

Trump Tweets mention OPEC crude oil prices fall immediately

U.S. President Trump (Trump) said on Friday (April 20) that OPEC had kept the oil price artificially high, and at the same time he said that he could not accept the so-called price manipulation and that the oil price in the futures market fell sharply on the same day.

U.S. President Trump issued a tweet on April 20 that OPEC kept oil prices at an artificially high level, and at the same time stated that he could not accept the so-called price manipulation and that the oil price in the futures market fell sharply immediately. The picture shows OPEC headquarters in Vienna, Austria. (JAKUB SUKUP/AFP/Getty Images)

OPEC reached an agreement in 2014 to reduce production, which helped increase oil prices.

Trump made a tweet at 6:57 am on Friday morning and said: “It looks like OPEC is doing this again. Oil has reached a record level, including ships loaded with oil at sea, and the price of oil has been raised artificially! This is not good, Will not be accepted!”

Subsequently, the West Texas Intermediate crude oil price fell rapidly from 68.30 USD to a low of 67.62 USD in less than an hour. By the end of the afternoon, the decline narrowed and remained lower than the date. Opening price. Another benchmark, the international benchmark Brent, has the same trend.

Due to the declining US crude oil reserves, geopolitical tensions, and concerns about the disruption of supply to major oil-producing countries, the two major oil price indexes of the oil market this week hit three-year highs.

Trump Tweet or Early Warning OPEC Don’t Raise Price
US Financial Television CNBC reported that it is not yet clear why Trump made a mention of OPEC’s tweets, but Reuters reported earlier this week that Saudi Arabia hopes that oil prices can rise above 80 US dollars per barrel to support the country’s oil giants. The Saudi Aramco Oil Company issued its shares for the first time.

Market participants speculated that Saudi Arabia may lobby more than two dozen oil-producing countries to cut production agreements, although current oil reserves have been reduced to five-year averages.

Because the agreement will help increase prices, the price of oil per barrel in 2016 was 26 US dollars, which is the lowest level in 12 years. The long-term collapse in oil prices has put pressure on Saudi Arabia and other countries that rely on oil revenues, and triggered a wave of bankruptcy and layoffs in the US oil industry.

For Trump’s tweet, some people questioned whether the U.S. government would control strategic oil reserves to push down oil prices, or it might sell reserve oil to increase government revenue. The strategic oil reserve is a crude oil reserve plan that can be put into use by the United States in case of an emergency, with a scale of several hundred million barrels.

However, oil market watchers said that Trump is unlikely to use reserve oil as a means to counter OPEC production cuts. John Kilduff, a founding partner of energy hedge fund Against Capital, said that the market is responding to Trump’s possible impact on oil policy.

“Saudit values ​​their relationship with Trump,” he said. “I think Saudi Arabia may loosen its plans to limit production.”

Previously, Saudi Arabia and OPEC, Russia and other producers reached a historic agreement: to reduce daily production by 1.8 million barrels from January 2017. This agreement was extended until the end of this year.

Several oil ministers met in Saudi Arabia on Friday to assess whether the various producers are sticking to this agreement. The Joint Ministerial Supervision Committee stated that the compliance rate of all countries has reached the highest level ever.

OPEC will meet in June to determine whether the terms of the agreement need to be adjusted according to market conditions.

When asked how Trump Tweets were viewed, Saudi Energy Minister Khalid al-Falih told CNBC: “The market should decide prices.”

Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak said on Friday that it is not known whether Russia will support the agreement before the end of the year. Russia is the world’s largest oil producer.

 

Contact Details:

Company Name: QYResearch Inc.  |  More Than 120,000 Market Research Reports

Global Market Research Report Leading Publisher

QYResearch Los Angeles Research Center

Email:  sales@qyresearchus.com

Web: http://www.qyresearch.com/

Address: 17890 Castleton Street Suite 218 City of Industry CA 91748 United  States